Newtonian laws tell us precisely what will happen, where and when. I don’t expect Climate Science to do this, and it’s a good thing
To collapse an adversary’s system into confusion and disorder causing it to overreact and underreact to activities that appear menacing while being at the same time ambiguous, chaotic, misleading, etc
Painting opinions as facts destroys good factual points. What we want to say isn’t always what others want to hear.
Activists, by definition, do not consider other issues. Marginalizing activists leads to progress.
Climate reporting has become a land of puffery. The frequency of subjective terminology has dulled the lines between fact and opinion to where science and rhetoric are hard to distinguish
The building of a moral distance between sides of a debate is an excuse to show no empathy. To empathize is a challenge to our egos.
Leonardo DiCaprio’s reference to warm Canada was a problem for numerous reasons, not the least of which is he has been corrected on it before. Get facts straight before you advocate.